Clear reading on vaping.

Carnet Vapoteur
Method

Strawberry ice: separating fruit from coolness

By Perrine Lavigne · · 7 minute read

Strawberry ice: separating fruit from coolness

Most notes taken on a strawberry ice end in a single sentence: too cold, or not fruity enough. That is exactly the kind of note that proves useless six months later, because it blends two independent parameters into one verdict. A strawberry and cold profile is described in two columns, not in a general impression. Here is how to build that grid and use it without spending an evening on it.

Strawberry ice: two axes, never one

An iced strawberry liquid is judged on two distinct scales: the intensity of the fruit on one side, the intensity of the cold sensation on the other. A single overall score can cover products that have nothing in common.

A strawberry at four with a coolness at one, and a strawberry at one with a coolness at four, produce the same average. They are two liquids nothing brings together. The average is the enemy of this kind of card.

Add a third value, calculated rather than felt: the gap between the two scores. That figure, positive or negative, tells you instantly which way a reference leans, and it is the only part of the card that transfers cleanly between brands.

A generic wording, not a brand

Before scoring anything, you need to know what is actually in the tank. The name circulates across makers with no connection to one another, and nothing on the label signals that.

British catalogues carry the wording across a long list of unrelated ranges, in bar style nic salts and in fifty fifty blends alike. Nicotine containing bottles here are capped at ten millilitres and at twenty milligrams per millilitre, so most of what you will find under this name is a ten millilitre salt at ten or twenty milligrams.

The practical conclusion is that the first line of your card is the brand, not the flavour. A card filed by flavour alone becomes unusable by the fourth entry, and no amount of detail in the scoring compensates for that.

Variants within a single brand compound the problem. A maker will happily run a strawberry and raspberry iced version alongside the plain one, on the same base and the same format. One extra word on the label, an entirely different profile in the mouth. Copy the full wording, word for word, rather than abbreviating it.

The name also appears on refillable pod bars sold as kits with bottles included. In that case the card covers a combination, not a liquid. Say so explicitly, otherwise the comparison with a bottle used in your own pod skews the whole notebook.

The two column grid

The table fits on half a page. Two columns of criteria, one summary line, and nothing else. The aim is to be able to fill it in within two minutes.

The strawberry column has three cells only. Intensity from one to five, the type of strawberry in a single word, and the position within the puff.

For the type, choose from a short closed list: ripe, sharp, jammy, or sweet shop. A closed list is what makes cards comparable with each other, and it is the discipline most personal notebooks lack.

For position, write attack, middle or finish. A strawberry that only appears on the finish behind the cold does not read back the same way as one that leads.

The coolness column has three cells as well. Intensity from zero to five, location, and persistence.

Location is ticked between throat, tongue and palate. A throat coolness tires faster than a lingual one across a long session, and that is information no product page will ever give you.

Persistence is recorded as the number of puffs before the sensation disappears. Approximate is fine: three, six, or more than ten.

The balance line carries the difference between the two intensities. A strawberry ice scored four on fruit and two on cold gives a balance of plus two, leaning fruit. A notebook filled in over a year produces a distribution of those gaps, and it is that distribution which reveals your real preference, often different from the one you believe you have.

The measurement protocol

A grid without a protocol produces numbers that cannot be compared. Three simple rules are enough to keep your scores stable over time.

Score the coolness first, on the first puff. It is the sensation that dulls fastest with repetition, so it has to be measured while perception is intact.

Score the strawberry next, on the third or fourth puff. The fruit reveals itself better once the surprise of the cold has passed.

Finally record the wattage and the coil used. The same liquid on a nought point eight ohm coil and on a nought point four does not produce the same numbers, and without that line the discrepancy stays unexplained.

Two further habits keep the series clean. Score at the same point in the day, because perception of cold shifts between a first vape of the morning and a late evening one. And score on a tank that is at least half full, since the last millilitre of a two millilitre pod behaves differently from the first.

Neither rule is demanding, and both cost nothing once they are automatic. What they buy you is the right to compare a card written in March with one written in September, which is the only comparison a notebook exists to make.

When to redo a strawberry ice card

A card is never final. Three situations call for redoing it rather than reading it back.

A change of hardware is the first. New pod, new power range, new card. The liquid has not changed, your measuring instrument has.

Coming back after an aromatic break is the second. After several weeks on cold profiles, your perception of cold shifts noticeably. Redoing the card beats correcting the old one.

A new batch is the third. Record the batch number where the bottle carries one, because it explains discrepancies nothing else accounts for. That identification reflex applies to every fruit blend, including when the same name covers several formats across several brands.

Frequently asked questions

The method points that block people most often when setting up this kind of table.

Should every flavour in the notebook use the same scale?

Yes for shared criteria such as sweetness or throat comfort. No for specific criteria, which can vary from one flavour family to another.

How do you score when the cold completely masks the fruit?

Put a one on strawberry and write masked in the comment. A low score with a stated cause beats an empty cell, which will be read as an oversight.

Can the grid be filled in from memory at the end of the day?

The numbers then lose their comparative value. If the moment is wrong, record only the free line and take the measurements again later.

Can two people share the same notebook?

Only if each keeps their own scoring column. Sensory scales are not transferable, but the gaps between references are.

Should purchase details be recorded on the card?

They are useful, provided they sit outside the sensory block. Anything commercial written next to an intensity score influences that score without your noticing.

Building a strawberry ice grid that survives a year

A useful strawberry ice notebook does not try to settle which of two brands is better. It measures two parameters separately, keeps the measurement context, and lets the comparison emerge on its own across entries.

The method transfers as it stands to every fruit profile carrying a cold layer. Two columns, one gap, one context: that is the minimum structure for a card still legible in a year, and the same discipline underpins a hardware tracking sheet on the device side.

Editorial content for adult readers only. Vaping products usually contain nicotine, a substance that causes addiction. Not for sale to under-18s in the United Kingdom. This article is not a buying recommendation.